Wikinvest Wire

Monday, January 16, 2012

Reuters Says Invest In Yourself

For many years I've been writing about the extent to which retirement will not be the same for people as it was for their parents (obvious observation) and that this has created a problem/challenge for each of us to solve for ourselves--meaning everyone needs to weave together their own personal solution. The other day Yahoo Finance ran an article from Reuters saying pretty much the same thing with some ideas very similar to what I've been talking about all this time.

I make no claim of originality as I think just about everything I have ever said on this subject is common sense that most people would ultimately come to on their own at some point. One item from the article that I had not thought of was bartering. The article had an anecdote of a woman who traded work for free access to a vacation home.

One of the ways the article suggested to "invest in yourself" is to try to beef up your investment knowledge. This doesn't typically come up in an article like this that is not really about investing. It makes sense to do this for a couple of reasons. One is that most people are likely to go it alone, at least I think most do it on their own, and given the importance the more you know the better off you'll be. And although not mentioned in the article there is no end to what can be learned about investing which seems like a pretty good way to stay engaged. There are of course lots of interests where you can always learn something new.

One suggestion I really liked from the article, and that I have written about, was having a "money making skill." The article talked about eBay sales, handyman work, cooking, babysitting and driving as ways to make money which of course can work but the ideas here are limitless. In past posts I've talked about how to monetize a hobby which could take years of pre-planning but would be worth it. I've mentioned my wife's uncle getting offered office work that tied into his career with a major league baseball team (not high paying but something and he could go to games for free), seasonal work for all sorts of things including state and national parks and of course backhoe work. There are many others.

There was even a don't drink soda shout, sort of, but comments about staying fit. The book assigned for my EMT class had a chapter on geriatrics which went into detail about the things that start to happen as we get older--but that start when we aren't that old. We start to lose muscle mass at 28. The loss of muscle mass when we are much older can start to cause various problems. That is just one little thing, there is a lot here but things like serious and regular exercise can make a big difference. Even just staying active doing stuff can help here--my neighbor with the backhoe as exhibit A. To repeat from past posts, he reported to a smoke call when he was 79. At 77 he worked the fireline on a serious fire up a steep hill.

The thing behind the thing with this article is the extent to which these types of suggestions can, to use my term, relieve a portion of the burden that would otherwise be placed on the portfolio. In my opinion these types of issues need to be sorted out before getting to how manage an investment portfolio as life choices and life circumstance factor heavily into asset allocation.

My brother took this picture the other night when Oregon State played at Arizona State, I thought it was pretty cool.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Managing one's own portfolio can be considered a part time job, too. Depending on the advisor and account size fees may be 1% or more so managing a million dollar portfolio yourself could be worth $10,000 or more each year (and no income or social security, etc. tax, either). Of course not everyone is willing or able to manage their own portfolio, and results may vary as they say.

Anonymous said...

One thing that is nearly impossible to plan for is your health.

I'm happy your 77 year old neighbor is fighting fires on mountains but that is not going to be everybody. You should not think that working out and giving up sodas is going to get you as he is. It may or may not.

I had nothing wrong (really - nothing except the occasional flue and muscle pull) up until 49. At that age I was in very good physical shape, eat really well, low stress, etc.

The I started with kidney stones - ain't lived till you've passed one. I changed my diet even more - still generating them. Work in progress.

Few years later I got arthritis in my wrists. I wasn't a blacksmith or a potter, nor did this (or stones) run in my family at all. I thought arthritis was stiff fingers for granny @ 80 - wrong.

It's pretty debilitating and can have a significant on your work, hobbies, and all facets of your life.

Folks are always citing some one off about an uncle who smoked 2 packs of camels and drank a fifth of whiskey every day - lived 'til 95 and never had to see the doctor.

Don't assume that if you are Superman at 20/30/40 that this will continue until your death, don't assume eating right and exercise will prevent everything, you may or may not be prone to family genetics.

Middle age can be very full of health surprises...

Anonymous said...

Adding to Anon 10:30. I was the picture of good health until age 52, and then it really hit the fan at age 61. Exercise and eat a good diet are good advice, but get good health insurance also.

RW said...

The math of earning some extra income during retirement is fairly compelling. If you assume an average yield and withdrawal rate of 4% from a portfolio for retirement, then taking home $1,000/month in pay means you're receiving the same income you would have if your portfolio were $300,000 larger.

But as Anon 10:30 points out, there are no guarantees. Based on 2009 national health statistics, approximately 32% of all (non-institutionalized) Americans have at least one basic actions difficulty or complex activity limitation. Make that 65 years of age or older and those same limitations affect 61% of the population (so an "Amen!" to Anon 10:48 WRT health insurance; be very glad 'Obamacare' assures pre-existing conditions will be covered at affordable rates and makes it illegal for insurance companies to drop you after you get sick).

"Old age ain't no place for sissies." - H. L. Mencken

Anonymous said...

Good comments today. As much as it pains me to agree with RW (and as an anti-Obama voter)I think the pre-existing provisions of Obamacare might save my bacon someday.

WH said...

Roger,

I spend the weekend rereading ALL of Bill Bernstein's articles at his Efficient Frontier website here:

http://bit.ly/9509R

I must say as an engineer that I find his approach more logical, reasoned, rational, and executable than yours. I just don't get the top-down strategy. The 200 dma rule seems counter intuitive to me. I guess lucky for you because I am the guy on the other side of your trades enabling you to do your thing. I believe in passive investing, what can I say? The writings and logic of Ben Graham seem as relavant today as when first written in The Intelligent Investor many years ago.

Although I will miss your philosophical-ish posts, the investment posts have become a negative distraction for me and therefore I believe it best to say good-bye after about six years of daily reading.

For some, your process might make sense. For me, I cannot understand it and I believe it takes way too much time to properly execute and maintain (country selection, theme development, new ETFs, individual stock monitoring etc.) even if I could understand it. I can get more tangible results by minimizing taxes and eliminating unecessary fees.

So good-bye, and best of luck. Hope the new job as chief goes well.

I am not sure why I am writing this other than I believe you care to a certain extent about your audience and thier opinions.

Anonymous said...

Have you noticed that most individuals against Obamacare have no health issues and have health insurance through an employer

Anonymous said...

I suspect much of the opposition to "Obamacare" comes from individuals who condemn his every move as counter to the Constitution, American values, or messages from deep inside their heads.

Proud Member Of