Monday, December 05, 2011
The Slog Continues
By now you've read a dozen articles ripping into the Friday's jobs data. The big bone of contention of course was the extent to which the decline in the headline rate dropped to 8.6% due to a large contraction in the labor force.
Whether you call it new normal or something else this is the middling, sluggish US economy continuing to unfold. A few years ago there was a mix of complacency that the then credit crunch wouldn't be that big of a deal which then gave way to serious fear, maybe even terror, that this was the end times in terms of the social fabric of the society.
Sluggish and/or middling has been my base case the whole time for several reasons and I expect that will continue. Obviously I am biased to seeing my thesis as playing out over the last few years and continuing to play out. If this turns out to be the case that does not mean some equities won't still do well.
If there is an economic condition where GDP growth is sluggish or perpetually teetering into a recession we know that certain defensive stocks tend to do well; usually staples, healthcare, utilities and ma bell telecom (with those last two be careful when interest rates are going up).
Year to date the S&P 500 is down a little over 1% while long time client holding Philip Morris International (PM) is up about 30%. Going a little broader the Staples Sector SPDR (XLP) is up a little over 8% which combined with XLP's yield is close to an 11% return--pretty good for soda and diapers. The Utility Sector SPDR (XLU) is up almost 11% on a price basis plus then it's 3.8% yield. The Healthcare Sector SPDR (XLV) is only up 6% but 7% ahead of the benchmark is noteworthy and XLV kicks in a little yield too.
Obviously the albatross around the market's neck has been and I believe will continue to be the financial sector. At this point the Financial Sector SPDR (XLF) is down 19% for the year and while I don't think it can drop 20-30% every year forever, I think it will be a long time before there is sustained price appreciation which contributes to the top down idea that the SPX will have a hard time making meaningful progress without the financial sector.
One of the reason's I prefer top down is that I think it makes the job much easier to do. If the above scenario is right then that means finding a domestic financial stock that skyrockets becomes much harder to do than in a year where XLF goes up by 25%.
Sectors like staples and the others mentioned above can be populated in the portfolio with domestic stocks in this scenario. The other sectors, like financials, would be a good place to look for foreign exposure either with individual stocks or ETFs. For example I am favorably disposed to quite a few countries for the long term like Australia (out temporarily as I have been disclosing for months), Chile and Norway.
There are individual stocks from these countries in the sectors that I think should be avoided in the US, like financials, and the ETFs for these countries have decent weighting in financials as a way in.
Going the individual stock route requires bottoms up research and monitoring of course and going the ETF route requires looking under the hood to understand what is in the fund and taking time to monitor the countries themselves and that is a lot of work. However if the US turns in another sub par decade (new decade to date the SPX is up 10.46% so you be the judge) and some of these other markets can again muster close to normal returns then the effort put in will not only have been worth it but could be (financial) life changing or better yet; (financial) life sustaining.
Whether you call it new normal or something else this is the middling, sluggish US economy continuing to unfold. A few years ago there was a mix of complacency that the then credit crunch wouldn't be that big of a deal which then gave way to serious fear, maybe even terror, that this was the end times in terms of the social fabric of the society.
Sluggish and/or middling has been my base case the whole time for several reasons and I expect that will continue. Obviously I am biased to seeing my thesis as playing out over the last few years and continuing to play out. If this turns out to be the case that does not mean some equities won't still do well.
If there is an economic condition where GDP growth is sluggish or perpetually teetering into a recession we know that certain defensive stocks tend to do well; usually staples, healthcare, utilities and ma bell telecom (with those last two be careful when interest rates are going up).
Year to date the S&P 500 is down a little over 1% while long time client holding Philip Morris International (PM) is up about 30%. Going a little broader the Staples Sector SPDR (XLP) is up a little over 8% which combined with XLP's yield is close to an 11% return--pretty good for soda and diapers. The Utility Sector SPDR (XLU) is up almost 11% on a price basis plus then it's 3.8% yield. The Healthcare Sector SPDR (XLV) is only up 6% but 7% ahead of the benchmark is noteworthy and XLV kicks in a little yield too.
Obviously the albatross around the market's neck has been and I believe will continue to be the financial sector. At this point the Financial Sector SPDR (XLF) is down 19% for the year and while I don't think it can drop 20-30% every year forever, I think it will be a long time before there is sustained price appreciation which contributes to the top down idea that the SPX will have a hard time making meaningful progress without the financial sector.
One of the reason's I prefer top down is that I think it makes the job much easier to do. If the above scenario is right then that means finding a domestic financial stock that skyrockets becomes much harder to do than in a year where XLF goes up by 25%.
Sectors like staples and the others mentioned above can be populated in the portfolio with domestic stocks in this scenario. The other sectors, like financials, would be a good place to look for foreign exposure either with individual stocks or ETFs. For example I am favorably disposed to quite a few countries for the long term like Australia (out temporarily as I have been disclosing for months), Chile and Norway.
There are individual stocks from these countries in the sectors that I think should be avoided in the US, like financials, and the ETFs for these countries have decent weighting in financials as a way in.
Going the individual stock route requires bottoms up research and monitoring of course and going the ETF route requires looking under the hood to understand what is in the fund and taking time to monitor the countries themselves and that is a lot of work. However if the US turns in another sub par decade (new decade to date the SPX is up 10.46% so you be the judge) and some of these other markets can again muster close to normal returns then the effort put in will not only have been worth it but could be (financial) life changing or better yet; (financial) life sustaining.
Labels:
cycles,
economics,
portfolio strategy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





11 comments:
How does the break of the 200 day SMA on SPY to the upside affect your process? BEar market over and time to position for new bull market or up too far too fast?
Thanks. Len
"Bear market over" is an unnecessary conclusion to think about. Demand for equities is either healthy or not. Should we get above the 200 DMA (just about there right now), that would be a positive. That the 200 DMA is downward sloping is a negative. Against that backdrop, any additions I might make here would probably be lower beta.
"Going the individual stock route requires bottoms up research and monitoring of course and going the ETF route requires looking under the hood..."
And the indexing route...buy, hold, and rebalance with the statistical edge of beating active management.
Ha Ha, couldn't resist.
What is the highest percentage of daily volume that I should buy of an etf.
I certainly would not want my ownership to be 10% of avg daily volume, but is 3% to much?
11:51, that is not something someone else can decide for you
last decade began with equities selling @ 30x, and ten year treasury @ 6.66%. That means that the risk free earnings yield was double the stock market.
We are now looking at the opposite situation. Equities selling @ 10x and 10 year @ 2%.
You can top down "exposure" trade all you want, but the valuations are making the decision easy for me. Buy equities.
12:23,
Agree with your comment. Europe's valuations look even better.
Interesting tidbit in today's WSJ in that there is really is no predictable relationship to a country's economic growth and stock market returns. It seems counter intuitive. Bill Bernstein has written about it. There seems to be a pretty strong correlation to higher stock market returns in developed countries with slow growth than undeveloped countries with explosive growth.
Even though people may really be bashing Europe and fleeing, but the expected long term return seems attracitve. People are caught up in stage 1 thinking.
By following my asset allocation, I need to put new money into equities, specifically foreign equities. I would venture to say that conventional wisdom says that is a dumb idea. I believe that there is a decent margin of safety right now.
Assuming there is a decent level of safety in the EU is akin to investing in French stocks in 1938.
The Germans would never invade. France had the better military!And their economy was humming to boot.Diplomats assured all that peace was everlasting.Common sense dictated otherwise.
I would not be so bold as to invest one's precious wealth in Europe, yet. The EU members are world's apart from each other in many ways.And talk is cheap.
T
1:04 are you really comparing Europe 1938 to Europe today, or are you just trying too hard to make a point?
1:04,
Agree. You might want to avoid U.S. You never know if Obama's second term would involve nationalizing of American commerce and socialization of wealth.
"What is the highest percentage of daily volume that I should buy of an etf."
I'm not asking for any one to identify how much risk I should take I am responsible for that.
I guess I am altering the question to are there any guidelines or rules of thumb out there printed anywhere?
Post a Comment