Part of the equation is the Fed's having stimulated speculation in many asset classes. All commodities have been very popular for the last few years so it makes sense that in an environment where speculation is being rewarded that commodities would participate. Another part of this equation is some level of concern being exhibited about what inflation may do shortly (or may be doing already, depending on your thought process).
I've read several commentaries from people who are not gold perma bulls making the case for some sort of big leg up in price over a short period of time. We own gold across the board for its diversification benefits and I have often said that if gold is the best performer you own then chances are stocks are struggling. That is true the vast majority of the time but not in the last couple of years.If prices are starting to blow off up to some level then predicting how long it lasts and to what level prices could go is well beyond what I can do but I think it makes sense to think about proportion.
If the price of gold implodes how much damage would that do to your portfolio and is whatever number you come up with acceptable? This is easy to quantify if your only exposure is something like GLD which we own for clients. Should the price cut in half you know exactly how much of a hit your portfolio would take. It would be more difficult to quantify if your exposure includes gold mining stocks or ETFs but if your total exposure is 15% of your portfolio and the price cuts in half then you're looking at maybe a 7-8% hit to the portfolio. Only you know if that is acceptable.
It makes sense to try to quantify what a large decline would do, whether you could tolerate and from there figure out what action to take. Action could include stop orders (these are not infallible), selling some now, pre-planning some sort of exit strategy (partial or otherwise) and of course you could decide to do nothing.
A few percent in the metal and a couple of more percent in a mining stock and your portfolio will not blow up should gold implode. A modest weighting like this could be enough to cause a drag but I think that goes with the territory every so often.
On an unrelated note I found an article yesterday that was about Peak Fish as in Peak Oil. Global X, are you listening?
Finally an update on Pep, the dog Joellyn and I took up to Seattle in late March to enter the search training program at Conservation Canines; apparently Pep, who is now known as Pips is a natural. The task is to help biologist track endangered and invasive species of animals through their scat. The dogs, once trained, are motivated to quickly find whatever they are looking for so they can then play fetch for the next however many hours.





13 comments:
I would agree that in normal cycles, the advance of precious metals would give the investor pause to figure an almost certain rollback.
At the risk of proclaiming "this time it's different", it may well be the case. With monthly government benefits outstripping monthly tax revenue for the first time since 1933 since February of this year, our economic engine sputtering and the President and his knaves showing neither leadership or maturity guiding the ship of state, investors would be foolish to not include traditional stores of value that are not paper backed by the "full faith and credit" (sic) of the United States.
The trick is not to overload on current commodity favorites.Rebalancing every six months or so into other investent vehicles is prudent in case the above summation is wrong.
Carefully crafted to avoid the b-word :)
I have to admit that the Gold 'bubble' (if it is one) has worried me. Thanks for reminding me that it's always a good idea to hedge your bets.
Brian
Online Trading Newbie
anon, not sure I was careful but it was intentional
Holy cow, gold=mania! You're going to give the gold bugs a heart attack. Everyone knows it can only go straight up and never come back. I saw it on one of the channels for pete's sake.
Still I remember the early 70s and the late 70s very well and this time really doesn't look different to me nor is there much more to be concerned about in the world than there was back then.
Good post and may prove to be pressient.
Good to hear that Pips has found gainful employment.
8:46, being bullish on something is one thing, believing (as yo say) that it cannot go down is something else and despite the last 11 years there are people who feel this way.
thanks for the comment on Pips
I'm expecting a big leg up sometime soon, but have done so for the last 12 months. I own some related equities but have top-sliced already and still the POG continues upwards. It's as though this irrational market is enjoying going on longer than I expected. Oh the pertinaciousness POG; when will it ever learn? Soon I'll be thinking about re-entering, which must appear in the dictionary under the definition of 'Fear'. It seems, though, that the advancing POG is an antithesis to financial stability and spending within one's limits, and is thus contrary to deeply withheld beliefs of mine that had been strengthened during the last housing bubble and crash (to my then benefit). The financial markets can be a quite teasing beast at times.
Justin,
Are you related to Alan Greenspan?
Thinking of shorting the market. Some candidates on high flier is burberry, Nflx.
Best,
Jeff From Milan, Italy
Anon 12:12 - No, take my words as verbatim. A very funny question, though.
Justin,
you are correct. But on some issues there is a mania like atmphere.
Jeff From Milan, Italy
Great timing ! I just liquidated my position on 15 Kg bar silver which I have been owning for past 1 year. Too much movement = risky!
Post a Comment