First the Grantham money quote in opining why "blue chip" stocks might be lagging he notes what he calls the "let's all look like Yale syndrome." This is a very funny quote and something we've talked about here frequently over the years. The title for the interview was What Did Investors Learn From the 2008 Stock Market Crash. I jokingly tweeted "probably not enough."
Personally I think any article I can find on the endowments is fascinating reading although new articles are harder to come by since the tide went out on a few of them--so to speak. The people running these funds are very smart, despite the tide going out, have very useful things to say about asset allocation but (repeat theme coming) trying to emulate them is a very bad idea especially using exchange traded vehicles to build large weightings to things trying offer "private equity" exposure. As discussed yesterday large exposures to commodities can be problematic in terms of exchange traded products "not working" the way they are supposed to and more volatility than originally bargained for.
The interview with Harvey seemed to be saying that MPT works except for when it doesn't. He specifically talks about the need for some sort of back up when it doesn't work. I know people love to believe the market is at all times efficient or rational but that is difficult to buy into given that the market is people and people are not collectively rational. If they were then behavioral finance wouldn't exist, there would be less of a death of equities sentiment and I think this list could be endless. However I do concede that some people believe in efficiency and rational behavior wholeheartedly so ultimately you can decide for yourself.In the last couple of years we have all learned a lot more about the 1930s and 1970s than we used to know. Given what we all know now and what we have recently been going through the conclusion I draw is that occasionally for very long periods of time the equity market does not get the benefit of the doubt and effort should be made to neutralize the downside which can be done with moderate exposures to things like inverse funds, certain commodities, absolute return funds and maybe you have other ideas you can share. And to repeat all of these things can be done in moderation. If you think of yourself as an investor then you need to accept that the market goes down every now and then and you don't need to hedge away every last negative basis point.





6 comments:
Traditionally, of course, dividend-paying equities and certain defensive sectors like healthcare and utilities have provided some downside protection. No big news there.
Bonds rarely come up in these kinds of discussions, but they can easily blend away much of the downside risk of equities. That's not particularly insightful either, but most folks simply overlook fixed income or limit their purview to treasuries.
For someone looking for absolute or hedge like mutual funds it is tough to beat the following:
-Hussman Total Return
-TFS Market Neutral
-PIMCO All Asset Authority
-Permanent Portfolio
-PIMCO Unconstrained Bond
-Doubleline Core
"Markets can remain irrational far longer than you or I can remain solvent."
John Maynard Keynes
Anon 6:34. Why put your money in those excellent hedge like funds when you can use Nakoma, RYMFX, etc... Ha, ha, LOL
there are 10 million illegal workers in American 67% from central america, 25% from asia, ther rest from various countries.
This nedless inflow of cheap unskilled labor into America drastically pushes down labor costs to the point that an American can not afford to take most unskilled labor jobs.
This has added to the depression in that these unskilled jobs that that typically pull families through a downturn no longer exist.
Support Arizona and only vote for politicians that promise to deport all illegals and tighten illegal worker laws and send those that employ illegals to jail.
Anon 9:30
Easy solution: quit extending unemployment so people actually have to work to eat.
Post a Comment