Wikinvest Wire

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Volcano!

You probably missed this because it has gotten so little attention but apparently a volcano has been erupting in Iceland disrupting all manner of air traffic in and around Europe. Ok no more sarcasm.

For quite a while now I have been writing about things like toll roads and airports as infrastructure investments. Recently I concluded that toll roads are more like utilities than true industrial stocks as they are usually characterized--still being a legitimate form of infrastructure investing.

Investing in publicly traded airports seems like a similar thing. Airports are part of the infrastructure theme and I think a similar type of utility as toll roads. Obviously the volcanic ash has impacted flights and so has impacted airline stocks and to a lesser extent some of the airport stocks I keep tabs on.

The chart captures Copenhagen Airport which has symbol KBHL in Denmark and CPNGF on the US pinks, Aeroports de Paris symbol ADP in Paris and AEOPF on the pinks, Fraport symbol FRA in Frankfurt and FPRUF on the pinks, Auckland Airport AIA in NZ and ACKDF on the pinks, Macquarie Airports MAP in Australia and MGPYF on the pinks and the Claymore Airline ETF (FAA).

The actual chart may not be of much use but anyone interested can take the symbols, make their own charts and draw their own conclusions.

I would expect FAA to be down more than the airports but it looks to me like a couple of the airports are down the same as FAA. MAP is down about as much as FAA and while you might think it odd that an Antipodean airport would be down in line with the airlines, MAP has a lot of exposure in the UK.

It is debatable whether an erupting volcano is a black swan event or not but airport traffic does not get disrupted like this very often so in terms of short term shocks it is possible that this is as bad as it gets. Obviously airports would be vulnerable to fewer commercial flights and fewer cargo flights caused by an economic slowdown or perception of a slowdown which would be more gradual than a volcano.

During the worst of the bear market most of the airports went down more than the S&P 500 except for Fraport which went down the same and Auckland which although did go down a little less had a large portion of its decline before the S&P 500 and did worse than the NZ 50 benchmark index. Interestingly Port of Tauranga (POT in NZ and PTAUF on the pinks), which is a sea port operations company turned out to be a much better place to hide than any airport I've looked at and most toll roads.

I think there can be a place for this sort of thing in a diversified portfolio (toll road or airport but probably not both) but they are very difficult to trade. Many don't trade much in their home markets let alone here on the pinks. Anyone can judge for themselves whether they think there is enough volume to get out of the size they would normally buy. I disclosed a while back owning a Chinese toll road personally and for one client for whom it was suitable but that it would not be a good buy for all clients because I have no faith that I could get out of a full across the board allocation. I own no airports anywhere as I prefer the toll road idea but even then it is very difficult to access for now. Who knows when or if this will change but I do find these to be of interest and so I keep tabs for now.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

What areas do you see as under-valued in this market?? I was looking at Platinum and other mining ETF's, but believe even those are over done at this time. Are you bullish on any areas at this time??? Thanks!!!

Ajax said...

There are rumours emerging that Iceland deliberately engineered the volcanic eruption...

http://tiny.cc/4qdl1

Don said...

Back when you went to Vancouver you mentioned a bunch of sector ETFs. I looked them up and they don't seem to pay much in dividends. How much importance do you place in them? I'm retired so dividends seem important. LOL

Roger Nusbaum said...

Don,

Do you mean the domestic small cap sector funds from PowerShares?

While they probably will not be big dividend payers it is usually difficult to get a great handle on what a brand new ETF will pay. I have not looked for this specifically but I would tell you to look on the website or call them for the yield on the underlying index as opposed to the fund. The index yield minus the fee gives an idea of what the fund will yield.

Depending on the size of your portfolio and if you are building at the sector level a combo of two or three different types of ETFs per sector can be a way to go, like a foreign, a small cap and a themed fund--you;d be covering a lot of bases with something like this.

Proud Member Of