Wikinvest Wire

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

The Big E!

What, you were expecting a different Big E than Elvin Hayes (number 44 in the white jersey)?

Bear Stearns (BSC) had a rough go on Monday and has had a rough few months. The stock closed at $62.30 down 11% on Monday and is down close to $100 from its high (feel free to go look for yourself as I too would be skeptical of the accuracy of that one were I reading it).

Along the way there have been some hedge fund problems associated with the company, a couple of cash infusion investments (at much higher levels) and the news yesterday was potential liquidity issues which were denied (by the former CEO).

I have no idea if they have liquidity issues or not but the market is certainly open to the possibility isn't it? For a while many have thought that Goldman Sachs (GS) will not have the same sort of trouble yet while BSC is down about 60% from its high, GS is down about 38% from its high (I should note that GS made its high on 10/31/07 while BSC's high came six months earlier).

The point is that Goldman's apparent fundamental good fortune (making some assumptions here) helped for a while (over the summer) but ultimately gave way just like the rest of the sector.

The whole way down the chatter about finding value in the sector, stocks being cheap and the great dividends have meant nothing--which is normal.

As I sort of alluded to yesterday there is an element of enticement with some of the financial stocks. First, very few big companies will fail; maybe there will be one or two. I think the idea of buying a big American bank that survives with a 6-7% yield now will look brilliant in three or four years but the dilemma is what about the next 20% and or the next 6-9 months?

The guys telling us what great values they are don't devote enough to how nasty things could get as the sector bottoms. Barron's cover story this weekend theorized about the future of Fannie or Freddie. If the equity of either one disappears it will cause a lot of damage before doing anything else.

This is really a know thyself moment. You could find the right bank that is fundamentally untouched by any of this and it still could drop 30% from here just in sympathy. Can you handle that? Is it even appropriate for you to try to handle that?

I have no idea where the bottom is but for now there is a lot about this crisis that is nowhere close to having been quantified. We should expect a big failure and no, I don't think New Century or Thornburg are anywhere near big enough to count as big.

I have been and remain underweight the sector.

I switched templates again because this one is very similar (code-wise) to the old one and so is easier for me to deal with.

17 comments:

Linda P. said...

Roger,

Is there anyway you could increase the size of the font...as my eye strain is winning over the protests I am hearing in my brain that I am too young to be making this request of you....

Thank you!

Roger Nusbaum said...

that is a good point.

i;ll do some more template work tonight to see what i can do.

Anonymous said...

Just came across another newer fund, they just keep coming,Rydex Managed Futures Strategy. while I hear alot about futures, is this just another gimmick or might it offer some opportunity for the little guy? there just seems to be too many funds out there to get into trouble.

Roger Nusbaum said...

rydex has a couple of funds with similar names. depending on which specfic fund you mean; i wrote about one fr TSCM a year ago and have disclosed owning it in my HSA.

Anonymous said...

I'll check that out but here is what I referred to. Would this be a more conservative hedge than short funds for a portfolio?

Investment Strategy

Seeks to provide investment returns that will match the daily performance of the S&P Diversified Trends Indicator (S&P DTI)
Managed Futures Strategy (H Class)

There is a $25,000 minimum.

Roger Nusbaum said...

that looks like the fund, RYMFX? but i don't think the minimum is right, not at brokerage firms anyway.

i don't think it is comparable to an inverse fund. it is an absolute return idea which i would think would be great in a bear market and a big lag in a bull market.

Anonymous said...

This was all I could find on thestreet.com
Your commentaries Roger are only back to 9/2007.
There are 3 classes of the fund, A,C,H. Schwab shows only H RYMFX available with $2500 minimum.


http://www.thestreet.com/_rms/funds/mutualfundinvesting/10344088.html

Roger Nusbaum said...

sorry it was here on RealMoney (sub req'd).

i was able to find that link so quickly because I have planning to revisit the fund in another article and wanted the first one to refer back to.

maybe it will be this week or next.

Anonymous said...

linda p. & Roger,
Regarding font size: ctrl+ increases the font size in Firefox. Worked for me on "The Big E!" page that Roger posted today.

Roger Nusbaum said...

TY for the tip

Anonymous said...

Thanks Roger, I also checked RYMFX on Morningstar and they show 99% in cash. I guess I don't understand how futures work. Pimco has a similar fund for commodities.

http://quicktake.morningstar.com/FundNet/Snapshot.aspx?Country=USA&pgid=hetopquote&Symbol=RYMFX

Roger Nusbaum said...

a fund that executes its strategy with futures contracts will be mostly cash.

example; you only need a couple thousand dollars (estimate) to equitize $100,000 with an S&P 500 futures contract so the remainder stays in cash. $2000 is probably more than would be needed to equitize $100k.

Roger Nusbaum said...

now to confuse the matter the fund doesn't actually use futures contracts.

rydex' bank creates customized products to create the exposure.

Anonymous said...

anon 8:27
The control + worked for me as well, using firefox. Thx for the info. I'm also a victim of failing fine focus....
Sam

Anonymous said...

Pausing periodically to wipe the nose prints from the monitor helps, too....*G*.

Roger,

I'm REALLY looking forward to your take on the Fed's (and others) move today. Talk about coming from left field! At first blush, it seems like a really good deal (better than hacking away in further big chunks at the FFR), but will it be enough? I did read that the Fed will repeat the "dosage" as necessary.

Jan

Anonymous said...

the crtl + works on mine fierfxo too, thxn. wot turns it of?? all the letters r realy REALLY BIGG!!

gjg49 said...

anon 3:51am
ctrl and minus sign reduces the size of the font in firefox (the opposite of ctrl and plus sign)

Proud Member Of