Wikinvest Wire

Saturday, September 17, 2005

The Big Picture For The Week of September 18, 2005

I had several questions come in during the last few days. Here are the questions (paraphrased) and my answers.

One asked about my thoughts about the hit Walmart took during the switch to the float method of calculating the S+P 500.

If you don't know, a lot of Walmart stock came out of the index as a result of the changes. I'm not sure if the question behind the question is should Walmart be bought here. All I can say is I have no interest in the name. From a market cycle stand point, companies larger than $100 billion have lagged and I think will continue to do so.

From a fundamental stand point the growth has slowed dramatically in the last few years and I am not sure how it can ramp up again. I live in the biggest town in my county, our town has only 35,000-40,000 people and we have two Walmarts. The point being there will be no more Walmarts here.

There are many other parts of the country that are also saturated to the point that there will be no new Walmarts. Sure they can expand overseas but there might be easier places in big box retail to make money while Walmart figures out how to market bok choi and Dodger's t-shirts in China.

One emailer asked about ADR sites. I use two of them. One is ADR.com and the other is the Bank of New York's ADR site.

A third question asked about small cap stocks. The emailer mentioned that he has read several multicap managers have been rotating out of small cap lately thinking the run is over.

I have touched on this before in a couple of different ways. The first thing here is the market history on this. Small cap typically leads at the start of a bull market cycle. The average period of time that small cap leads is about 3 years. There have been times where small cap has lead for as long as 5 years.

So far this year small cap has out performed by a matter of basis points. If small cap outperforms large cap this year, that would be six years in a row. I believe that would be a record. So it makes sense to at least question whether small cap will soon lag large cap. In some of the six years the lead of small cap has been very narrow, perhaps that invalidates the six year issue, I'm not sure.

With the history lesson out of the way, the reader wants to know what I think. I doubt he will like my answer. I don't think in terms of how much small cap or large cap I have. The way I look at it is by average cap size of the portfolio. The average cap size of the S+P 500 is about $90 billion. These days the average cap size of client portfolios is around $40 billion up from $35 billion a few months ago.

Depending on what is going on at the time, increasing cap size might mean selling a smaller name
or it might mean adding a a larger name with out selling anything. Hence the logic behind thinking of cap size in this way.

While I don't know exactly when, I imagine my next move will be to make the average cap size a little bigger than it is now. The visibility to this is that if things go I think they might next year I would add a little more foreign to the mix, some of which will increase the average cap size of the portfolio.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Concerning the megacaps, if you chart the relative performance of the S&P 100 (OEX) vs the S&P500 (SPX), the OEX has been consistently underperforming since Nov 2002. I have no idea if this factoid has any market significance but personally, I've avoided large cap more so than usual the last two years.

technicator.NET said...

What do you think of oil? I wrote about it in my technicator.net blog and I have a bearish stance

Roger Nusbaum said...

oil. Long term or short term?

A couple of weeks ago on CNBC Asia I said that oil might go to the low $60's, right now it seems like it wants to go a little lower.

However longer term I expect increased global demand from China, India and soon Viet Nam and Pakistan will disrupt supply and demand is it now exists. This creates a clear and obvious tailwind that should be good for oil stocks.

Stockcoach said...

Hi Roger,

I think your post on smallcaps/largecaps overlooks two important issues. One, small caps do tend to outpeform over time (together with their value stock cousins) and so their recent outperformance is not too surprising given how poorly they did over much of the nineties. Second (and more important), the only way to consistently add lots of value to a portfolio is to pick mispriced stocks. Usually that means investing almost exclusively in small caps since they have less analyst and institutional following due to their lower liquidity. In that sense, shouldn't an active manager ALWAYS invest in small caps and leave the large cap portion of a portfolio to an index fund?

Roger Nusbaum said...

reply to Stockcoach;

I imagine that every post I have ever written overlooks at least two things if not more :-)

The only way to add value is to pick mis-priced stocks? I am hard pressed to think there is only one way to have success in the stock market. What you have written is valid but so are many other approaches.

If small caps lagged in the 1990's, and they did, it is logical to assume they will lag again. There is a cyclicality to this that may or may not be predictable in the future. So from the top down I would say there are times to be heavier in one size versus the other but not always in only one.

Just my opinions.

Proud Member Of